Despite growing public awareness and policy efforts, gender equality has not yet been fully established in Western societies. Previous research has shown that hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes, which are grounded in traditional gender stereotypes, play a key role in the reproduction of gender inequalities. Whereas, hostile and benevolent sexism among adolescents has been previously studied, limited attention has been paid to social characteristics in understanding the support for these attitudes. In this article, we aim to study fitness singles how the family, the school and romantic partnerships relate to adolescents’ benevolent and hostile sexist attitudes. We relied on data gathered in 2013 by the Flemish Youth Research Platform and performed multivariate analyses on 755 parent-child dyads (n_> = 342; n₊ = 413). Our results indicate that social characteristics especially matter to explain the variation in benevolent sexist attitudes among girls and hostile sexist attitudes among boys. Among girls, being in a romantic relationship and parents’ traditional moral beliefs was strongly related to benevolent sexism; while for boys, hostile sexism was strongly related to being enrolled in technical and vocational education. In the conclusion, we elaborate on the implications of our findings.

Introduction

Nowadays gender equivalence have not just obtained growing societal interest, however, is served by become an essential coverage topic in the Western communities. not, despite enduring work, gender equivalence hasn’t started totally established in regards to work rates, labor market position, commission, involvement within the decision-while making positions, workshare throughout the household and you will child care (The nation Lender, 2011; European union, 2017). Regardless if multiple reasons lay at the rear of these types of persistent gender inequalities, it’s unquestionable one conventional gender philosophy and you can stereotypes (i.age., gender prejudice) enjoy an option part. Very early in life, boys, and you may girls is actually taught how exactly to work, just what issues to help you including or would and what playthings or clothes to help you choose (Eccles ainsi que al., 2000). On the age of 4 in order to five years old, people reveal gender stereotypical preferences having, like, girls preferring close stories and boys leaning toward the greater number of daring of these (Durkin and you will Nugent, 1998). This type of gender stereotypes carry social meanings, strategies and you can (role) standards one organize lifestyle by often (subtly) influencing and you can powering man’s beliefs, attitude, thinking, and behavior (Eckes and you can Trautner, 2000; Ridgeway and you can Correll, 2004). While in the teens, these types of gender stereotypes end in boys and girls mainly hanging out that have same-sex colleagues and you can playfully avoiding each other (Powlishta, 2003; ). Through the adolescence that it prevention game vanishes because of the emergence from sexual attraction and you will a desire for intimacy (Maccoby, 1998; Rudman and you can Glick, 2008). These types of moving on intergroup dating provide the analysis regarding adolescents’ sexist thinking quite interesting. Sexist perceptions and thinking limit and you may influence future lifetime trajectories by the (commonly discreetly) impacting philosophy, attitude, and you may practices (Eckes and you may Trautner, 2000; Ridgeway and Correll, 2004). They suggest gender-particular behavior and you can roles one to hamper younger people’s capability to detect the many emotional, social, and you may instructional capacities and you may alternatives which may be expected (Rainey and you may Corrosion, 1999; Paul Halpern and you can Perry-Jenkins, 2016). Sooner, so it undermines (policy) work one to focus on gender equality (Glick et al., 2001).

Benevolent and you can Hostile Sexism when you look at the Social Spheres: The latest Impact off Moms and dads, College and you will Relationship into Belgian Adolescents’ Sexist Thinking

With what social contexts perform sexist attitudes exist after that? Studies have not yet very carefully learned this new you are able to societal variation of sexist attitudes certainly one of teens. Even with an enormous added really worth into the putting on perception towards the sexist attitudes, really search with this material might have been generally done by psychologists just who usually work at relatively small and homogeneous samples. Mathematically it has got hence come difficult to studies the new social version from sexist thinking. Early in the day research one of (young) people has recently indicated that socio-financial issues such earnings, employment status and you may educational attainment affect man’s socio-political attitudes (Crompton and you can Lyonette, 2005; Davis and you can Greenstein, 2009; ). Centered on so it, i predict you to definitely mans personal records issues whenever studying sexist attitudes. Ergo, this research is designed to mention exactly how socio-economic and you may cultural elements relate to each other benevolent and you will hostile sexist thinking among teens regarding a sociological perspective. I do that by using Glick and you can Fiske’s (1996) difference in intense and you will benevolent sexist perceptions. To understand this new socio-financial and you may cultural background regarding adolescents we differentiate between ascribed and you will reached societal features.