Understood as opposed to claimed social referent recognition and you can connection relationship and you may perseverance

Posté par dans postorder brud till salu

Understood as opposed to claimed social referent recognition and you can connection relationship and you may perseverance

Lover tastes inside the dating

Felmlee, D. H. (2001). From appealing to appalling: Disenchantment with an intimate mate. Sociological Views, forty two, 263-280. [ Website links ]

Fiore, A. T., & Donath, J. (2005). Homophily when you look at the online dating: When can you including some body particularly your self? CHI, conference towards peoples factors during the computing assistance. 1317-1374. [ Website links ]

Furman, W. (1985)patibility and you may incompatibility inside the kids’ peer and you will brother relationships. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you can in conflict relationships (pp. 61-87). New york: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Links ]

Gattis, K. S., Berns, S., Simpson, L. Elizabeth., & Christensen, A. (2004). Wild birds of a good feather otherwise uncommon wild birds? Links among character proportions, resemblance, and you may ily Psychology, 4, 564-574. [ Links ]

Gaunt, Roentgen. (2006). Partners resemblance and marital pleasure: Was comparable spouses happier. Log from Identity, 74, 1401-1420. [ Backlinks ]

Goffman, Age. (1952). Towards the cooling the goal out: Some element of variation to inability. Psychiatry, 15, 451-463. [ Hyperlinks ]

Gonzaga, Grams. C., Campos, B., & Bradbury, T. (2007). Resemblance, convergence, and you will matchmaking satisfaction within the dating and you may maried people. Record from Identification and you may Public Mindset, 93, 34-48. [ Backlinks ]

Personal Relationship, fifteen, 281-295

Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Reflect, mirror: The necessity of looks from inside the day to day life. Albany: State College of brand new York Force. [ Hyperlinks ]

Hatfield, Age., & Sprecher, S. (2009). Complimentary hypothesis. In H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia away from peoples matchmaking (Vol. dos, pp. 10651067). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [ Links ]

Hatfield, Age., Traupmann, J., Sprecher, S., Utne, Meters., & Existe, J. (1985). Collateral and you may romantic relations: Current browse. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you may incompatible relationship (pp. 91-117). New york: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Hitsch, G. J., Hortacsu, A good., & Ariely, D. (2010). Coordinating and you can sorting in the matchmaking. Western Economic Remark, 100, 130-163. [ Backlinks ]

Houran, J., Lange, R., Rentfrow, J. P., & Bruckner, K. H. (2004). Would online dating evaluating works? An evaluation off first evidence having an advertised ‘predictive make of erican Journal regarding Therapy, 6, 507-526. [ Website links ]

Houts, R. M., Robins, E., & Huston, T. L. (1996)patibility together with development of preily, 58, 7-20. [ Backlinks ]

Huston, T., Niehuis, S., & Smith, S. (2001). The first relationship origins out-of conjugal distress and you can divorce proceedings. Newest Advice when you look at the Psychological Science, ten, 116-119. [ Website links ]

Ickes, W. (1985). Introduction. Into the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you can in conflict dating (pp. 1-7). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]

Ickes, W., & Charania, Yards. R. (2009)patibility. Inside H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia from people relationships (Vol. step 1, pp. 283-286). Newbury Playground, CA: Sage. [ Backlinks ]

Kalick, S. Meters., & Hamilton III, T. Elizabeth. (1986). The fresh new coordinating theory reexamined. Log of Personality and you can Societal Psychology, 51 , 673-682. [ Links ]

Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. Letter. (1995). The latest longitudinal span of marital top quality and you may balance: A review of principle, tips, and you will browse. Emotional Bulletin, 118, 3-34. [ Links ]

Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. Letter. (1997). Neuroticism, marital telecommunications, while the trajectory out-of marital fulfillment. Record out-of Identity and Social Mindset, 72, 1075-1092. [ Backlinks ]

Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. Letter. (2005). Contextual affects on the matrimony: Effects having rules and you will input. Most recent Rules into the Psychological Research, 14, 171-174. [ Backlinks ]

Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, Elizabeth., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, Grams. Peterson, D.Roentgen. (1983). Evaluating personal relationships. Inside H. H. Kelley, Age. Berscheid, A great. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. Slovakien kvinnor L. Huston, Grams. Levinger. D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Intimate dating (pp. 20-67). Ny: Freeman. [ Backlinks ]